Counterfeit Drug Detection Using Deep Learning and Synthetic Data Generation: A Hybrid Approach

Authors

  • Ivan Arabome Author
  • Evan O. Arabome Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67378/1s0a6r05

Keywords:

Counterfeit drug detection; deep learning; synthetic data generation; diffusion models; computer vision; pharmaceutical authentication; transfer learning.

Abstract

Counterfeit pharmaceuticals pose a critical threat to global public health, particularly in low- and middle-income countries where regulatory oversight and access to advanced authentication tools are limited. This study presents a comprehensive deep learning framework for automated counterfeit drug detection that addresses the persistent challenge of limited authentic counterfeit training data through synthetic data generation. A hybrid dataset was constructed by combining real-world pharmaceutical images from public repositories with synthetically generated counterfeit images produced using Stable Diffusion XL. Five convolutional neural network architectures—ResNet50, InceptionV3, VGG16, EfficientNetB0, and MobileNetV2—were evaluated under real-only, synthetic-only, and hybrid training regimes. The hybrid approach achieved the best performance, with ResNet50 attaining 97.0% accuracy and an AUC-ROC of 0.993, significantly outperforming models trained on real data alone. Integration of optical character recognition for batch number and expiration date verification further improved system accuracy to 98.2%. A mobile application prototype was developed to demonstrate deployment feasibility, achieving sub-200 ms inference time after model optimization. The results confirm that carefully designed synthetic data generation, when combined with real-world data, substantially improves robustness, generalization, and practical usability of AI-based pharmaceutical authentication systems.

References

[1] World Health Organization, “Substandard and falsified medical products,” WHO Fact

Sheet, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/substandard- and-falsified-medical-products

[2] World Health Organization, “WHO Global Surveillance and Monitoring System for sub-

standard and falsified medical products,” Geneva, Switzerland, WHO Technical Report, 2022.

[3] International Trademark Association, “The economic impact of counterfeiting and piracy:

Report prepared for BASCAP and INTA,” Frontier Economics, London, UK, 2021.

[4] Dégardin, K., Roggo,Y., and Margot, P.(2014). Understanding and fighting the medicine DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2013.01.009

counterfeit market. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, vol. 87, pp. 167-175.

[5] Bansal, A., Garg, L. and Sharma, R. (2020). Artificial intelligence in pharmaceutical

industry: A review. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 412-421, 2020.

[6] LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. and Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539

436-444.

[7] Mackey, T. and Nayyar, G. (2017). A review of existing and emerging digital technologies

to combat the global trade in fake medicines. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 587-602.

[8] Newton, P., Green, M. and Fernández, F. (2010). Impact of poor-quality medicines in the DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2009.11.005

de- veloping’ world,” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 99-101.

[9] Shorten, A. and Khoshgoftaar, T. (2019). A survey on image data augmentation for deep DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-019-0197-0

learning. Journal of Big Data, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1-48.

[10] Alsallal, M., Thompson, K. and Zaid, H. (2020). Counterfeit drug detection using X-ray

fluores- cence and machine learning. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 109, no. 8, pp. 2553-2561.

[11] Mondal, S., Wijewardena, K. and Karuppuswami, S. (2021). MediVerify: A computer

vision and blockchain platform for drug authentication. in Proc. IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency (ICBC), Sydney, Australia, pp. 1-5

[12] Kumar, R. Patel, S. and Singh, V. (2021). Multi-modal pharmaceutical authentication using

OCR and CNN. Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 185, Article ID 115634.

[13] Goodfellow, I. (2014). Generative adversarial nets. in Advances in Neural Information Processing

Systems (NeurIPS), Montreal, Canada, pp. 2672-2680.

[14] Zhang, L. Zhu, W. and Wang, J(2020).Medical image synthesis using generative

adversarial networks: A review. IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 185734-185753.

[15] Ho, J., Jain, A.and Abbeel, P. (2020). Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. in Advances in

Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), Virtual Conference, pp. 6840-6851.

[16] Rombach, R. Blattmann, A., Lorenz, D., Esser, P. and Ommer, B. (2022). High-resolution

image synthesis with latent diffusion models. in Proc. IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), New Orleans, LA, 2022, pp. 10684-0695.

[17] Patel, S. and Kumar, R.(2022.“Smartphone-captured pharmaceutical product images

dataset. Mendeley Data, v2. [Online]. Available: https://data.mendeley.com/datasets

[18] Fernando, H. (2023). Authentic and counterfeit drug images dataset. Kaggle. [Online]. Available:

https://www.kaggle.com/datasets

[19] Buslaev, A., Iglovikov, V., Khvedchenya, E., Parinov, A., Druzhinin, M. and Kalinin, A. (2020).

Albumentations: Fast and flexible image augmentations,” Information, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/info11020125

[20] Smith, R. (2007). An overview of the Tesseract OCR engine. in Proc. International Conference on DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAR.2007.4376991

Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), Curitiba, Brazil, pp. 629-633.

[21] Agarwal, A., Singh, P. and Gupta, M., (2022). Mobile application for counterfeit drug detection

using convolutional neural networks. Mobile Information Systems, vol. 2022, Article ID 5847293.

[22] Perez, L. and Wang, J. (2017). The effectiveness of data augmentation in image classification

using deep learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.04621.

[23] Chawla, N., Bowyer, K., Hall, L. and Kegelmeyer, W. (2002). SMOTE: Synthetic minority

over-sampling technique. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, vol. 16, pp. 321-357.

[24] Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., and Hinton, G. (2012). ImageNet classification with deep

convolu tional neural networks. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), Lake Tahoe, NV, pp. 1097-1105.

[25] Newton, P.,Green, M., Fernández, F., Day, N., and White, N. (2006). Counterfeit anti-infective drugs. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 602-613. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70581-3

Downloads

Published

2026-05-29

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Categories

How to Cite

Arabome, I., & Arabome, E. O. . (2026). Counterfeit Drug Detection Using Deep Learning and Synthetic Data Generation: A Hybrid Approach. Scholar J, 4(1), 260-274. https://doi.org/10.67378/1s0a6r05